Komatsu is second only to the US Caterpillar company in the construction machinery stakes, and actually makes the biggest ’dozer in the world, the Model D575A. But the first Komatsu bulldozer was much smaller than the D575A, and it’s this early G40 that is the latest 1:48 military vehicle released by Tamiya.
Komatsu developed the G40 to speed up construction of Japanese airfields - until it became available, most runways were produced purely with manual labour - and some 150 G40s were produced from 1943 until the end of World War II. The Tamiya model is a dinky little thing, just 75 mm (2.9 in) long, but the detail is very neat for all that, with components such as hydraulic lines, front grille, suspension system and, of course the ’dozer blade, all well reproduced.
The tracks are one-piece plastic parts though, and so are non-moving items. However, Tamiya has included a decent driver figure, who holds the controls realistically. An unusual feature at the front is the grille badge, which is included as a metallized-decal, and very handsome it is, too.
As you can see from the picture above, the G40 is suitable for use with typical Japanese military aircraft of the time, here a Mitsubishi Zero fighter. Add a section of runway, some figures, plus a stand of palm trees, and you have the makings of a very attractive diorama setting.
An interesting point is that the name engraved on the front grille is 'Komatu', without the 's'. That's how the real thing is, so Tamiya has it modelled correctly, but SMN can't find out the story behind the spelling - does anyone out there know the answer?
Visit Komatsu’s heavy engineering site here.
The G40 bulldozer is due out soon; meantime you can obtain the 1:48 Tamiya Zero as a kit with crew figures included, which would work particularly well in a diorama setting, here: 1/48 A6M5/5a Zero Fighter, Zeke
You might also like to look at a set for extra detail here: Mitsubishi A6m Zero Fighter Photo-etched Detail Set 1-48 Tamiya
Popular Posts
-
SMN report: We were recently sent two rather nice contemporary drawings of the Junkers Ju 88 - and thought they would come in very useful as... -
SMN REPORT: “Command the skies of a dark, futuristic Earth” is the tagline to this interesting steampunk-meets-deco science-fiction kit from... -
Weekender with Mat Irvine: The 1:24 scale Gemini spacecraft was one of Revell’s most popular space kits of the 1960s, and now, if you missed... -
SMN report: The NASA Juno spacecraft blasted off on Friday, its aim, to discover more about the biggest planet in the Solar System, Jupiter.... -
SMN update: GreenLight Toys has unveiled a series of foam-paper car kits for 2012, five American muscle cars and one muscle truck. The MotoB... -
BY MAT IRVINE Today, the Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angeles is hosting a sale by RM Auctions that includes one of the most famous cus... -
Mat Irvine reports I made a quick trip to the London Toy Fair at the end of January, and one of the biggest surprises of my visit was to fin... -
Following the excellent Desktop Zero model, Tokyo-based imcth is offering a 1:32 scale kit that assembles to make an ultra-detailed structur... -
Mat Irvine reports: Revell-Germany continues its Classic Kits reissue range (‘A classic kit from 5 decades of modelling history’) with the H... -
SMN Report: We make no apologies for featuring another World War II bomber from Hong Kong Models - this one adds two more engines, and a lot...
Like many Japanese Corperate names, they changed post war. An example is Toyota was known as TOYODA
ReplyDeleteThis is an older style of representing Japanese in Roman letters. In Japanese, a [t] sound followed by a [u] sound is always pronounced [tsu]. Similarly, a [t] sound followed by an [i] sound is always pronounced [chi]. In this older style of pronunciation, predictable and regular features of pronunciation like this aren't represented, which makes the words look rather different from how they're actually pronounced. So a word pronounced "chimatsu" would be represented as "timatu". The more common practice today uses 'tsu' and 'chi' instead.
ReplyDeleteSorry, where I said "In this older style of pronunciation," I meant to say "In this older style of transliteration."
ReplyDeleteBy the way, thanks for reviewing this kit! Building it now, and it's a treat.